From: Emanuele Aina (faina.mail@tiscali.it)
Date: Sat Apr 20 2002 - 18:01:06 CEST
Michele Andreoli specificò:
>>You may be surprised, but as a result the choice of the writer
>>has been GTK+ and TinyX on the framebuffer for their maturity/stability,
>>their low memory footprint (lower than Qt/E) and for the fact that their
>>source is completely free.
>
> True. But GTK+ light; it is, more on less only a wrapper library
> toward Xlib; difficult to use and to learn (in my opinion).
> I cannot learn an API that use an API with functions like:
>
> gtk_notebook_set_show_border(....)
> gtk_notebook_get_current_page( ...)
>
> I simply, cannot remember these names!
>
> On the other hand, Qt speak C++ and I can rember something like:
>
> notebook.get(current_page) (only an example).
I know. It is because GTK is written in C, to make binding easier.
There isn't any support from gtkmm (the c++ binding for GTK)?
-- Au revoir. Lele... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:22 CET