Re: [mu TECH] Forth interpreter / Kforth compile size

From: JesusC - Jesus Consuegra (jesus.consuegra@retemail.es)
Date: Wed Jul 12 2000 - 22:51:58 CEST


Not at all!. There are both win32 and linux binaries there...
Jesús.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfie Costa" <agcosta@gis.net>
To: <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [mu TECH] Forth interpreter / Kforth compile size

> On 11 Jul 2000, at 7:41, JesusC - Jesus Consuegra <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>
wrote:
>
> > You can also try Kforth, is currently supported and comes along with a
> > graphic package that allow to show function plots. Works well under
Win32
> > and Linux, sources and documentation included.
>
> Thanks. After DL'ing it, it turns out Kforth needs to be compiled.
Before
> attempting that, I should say that I'm most interested in comparing Linux
> Forths to see which is the smallest**, so if you can say how many K the
> resulting Kforth binary compiles to, that would also help.
>
> (**And after that, the various features...)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
> For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET