Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?

From: Bob Romprey (zoot@farts.com)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 08:42:16 CEST

Next message: Andy Grebe: "GCC 3.0, Addons and more!!! [mu SETUP]"
Previous message: Bob Romprey: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Maybe in reply to: Shawn Williamson: "Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Next in thread: Shawn Williamson: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Reply: Shawn Williamson: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Ok,
upon compiling using the -static flag
I've got the following files
libtsocks.so.1.7 @ 43,757bytes
validateconf @ 26,388bytes
inspectsocks @ 16,344bytes
save @ 968,511bytes

upon double checking your compile is this a drastic difference???
I myself have no desire to install tsocks in any of my systems, so don't know if it'll work or not

------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the world's greatest site at http://www.farts.com and listen to the fart
of the day. Also, get your very own farts.com E-mail account. FREE!!!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.dk

Next message: Andy Grebe: "GCC 3.0, Addons and more!!! [mu SETUP]"
Previous message: Bob Romprey: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Maybe in reply to: Shawn Williamson: "Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Next in thread: Shawn Williamson: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Reply: Shawn Williamson: "Re: Any C++ programmers out that that can compile tsocks?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:19 CET