Re: [oc] RS Codec

["Brian Edmonston" <brian@edmonston.com>]

By simple, it should have timing and frequency recovery, and maybe IF
downconvertion (actually kind of simple).  No equalization tho.  Assume AWGN
channel, is what I mean.

The intelsat spec is probably a good starting point.   Do you have that
available?


-b

----- Original Message -----
From: Nanda Kumar K.G <nanda@cdotb.ernet.in>
To: <cores@opencores.org>
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: [oc] RS Codec


>
> Hi Brian Edmonston ,
> Yeah , single chip QPSK demodulator might be attempted but if it's
> simple( subjective term and i can't comment on it :-)} it might not
> usable. We can try by taking some specs like INTELSAT specs for QPSK
> modems and try to attempt it , or we can plunge directly into Turbo TCM
> modems ... ???
>
>  On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Brian Edmonston wrote:
>
> > Yes.
> >
> > I am also interested in developing a simple, but useable,
QPSKdemodulator.
> > Would that be of interest?
> >
> > -b
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Nanda Kumar K.G <nanda@cdotb.ernet.in>
> > To: <cores@opencores.org>
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 9:32 AM
> > Subject: [oc] RS Codec
> >
> >
> > > i would like to develop RS codec for opencores , iam currently doing
> > > research in modems for SAT COM and turbo codes , is anybody interested
?
> > >
> > >
> >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > K.G.Nanda Kumar
> > > Research Engineer
> > > SAT COM  C-DOT
> > > 71/1,millers road
> > > Bangalore 560052
> > > ph:2263399 Extn 323
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> K.G.Nanda Kumar
> Research Engineer
> SAT COM  C-DOT
> 71/1,millers road
> Bangalore 560052
> ph:2263399 Extn 323
>