From: Richard Kirkcaldy (Richard.kirkcaldy@IC24.net)
Date: Mon Nov 01 1999 - 21:19:16 CET
----- Original Message -----
From: Angel Martin Alganza <ama@ugr.es>
To: <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>; <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>
Sent: 30 October 2000 22:06
Subject: Re: 486 box
>
> >I have found that win3.11 is faster than mulinux, so I would prefer to
use
> >that if possible. But I don't know that win3.11 is as good at
networking,
> >and it certainly isn't as good at security.
>
> I don't think it is. I actually don't think any Windows could even be
close
> to any Linux system regarding networking, stability and/or security.
> Security is not a big concern for those systems, since they are thoughts
> just as "terminals" for users; but stability and ease of maintenance is an
> important one... that's way I would like to go with Linux.
>
Well I have had xwindows just stop at times when resource usage got too
high, not often though. It does happen more often in win3.11
-- Richard Kirkcaldy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:16 CET