From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 23:20:09 CEST
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:51:13PM +0100, José Luis Gómez Dans nicely wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 06:27:05PM +0200, Michele Andreoli wrote:
> > > I was hoping that the "rustic" support wasn't that "rustic" :-)
> > >
> >
> > The rustic spooler is not full tested; tests cost much paper :-)
> > Please, try to improve it.
>
> Well, since my processing program works, I have also tackled the
> lpr spooler not doing the right thing. Two issues:
> - The DEVICE variable is set to /dev/lp. I do have two parallel ports,
> (lp1 and lp2), so I decided to have two different lpr's: lpr_1 lpr_2.
So ugly! This is not in the Linux style. You can do better.
Michele
-- "I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do?" -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:16 CET