From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 09:43:08 CEST
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Dumas Patrice nicely wrote:
>
> Well, the problem is that there is some common things between all the networking
> stuff, like the definition of the network, the netmask, etc, that could be
> different from interface to interface (mainly localized in manual_config()).
> I also think like you that it would be better to have separated .fun, but maybe
> there could be a sort of "library" for common functions, so that the code isn't
> triplicated (or even more...).
>
> What do you think about that ?
>
The solution is to put the network theory in a separated script: netconfig.
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET