From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 20:31:27 CEST
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 05:31:55PM +0200, jef knoors nicely wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michele Andreoli <m.andreoli@tin.it>
> To: <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 12:39 PM
> Subject: Re: v9r2u Re: [mu TECH] v9.r1b us.map is misnamed
>
>
> > On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 08:37:19AM +0200, Jef Knoors nicely wrote:
> > > Simple answer to a simple queation:
> > > what makes a stable version different from a beta ?
> > > The stable is stable.
> >
> > It is not possible to know in advance if a new release is "stable",
> > or not. Using your algorithm, a release become stable only if I
> > have no times to add new features.
> >
> > Michele
> >
> If the new features are in USR, then root and boot can become stable.
> The new USR release would be tinyer to download.
But I can't separate these images: the "mu" script have to keep sign
of boundary and sizes! The exact starting point of ROOT and USR images
are saved in the BOOT segment, or floppy system can't work.
The choise to keep togheter BOOT,ROOT and USR was dictated by single-floppy
birthday of muLinux.
Michele
-- I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't remember any. Would two negative ones do? -- Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET