From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Feb 1 19:58:33 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i123wXhs002224 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:33 -0800 Received: from pine-info-arch ([220.190.11.50]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i123wRVM009078 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 19:58:29 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Roy" Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:05:17 -0200 To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: NaturalGain+ , What more do you want? stammerer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXX, Probability=90%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, OBFU_PORNWORDS 0.864, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_70_90 0.572, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000' natgain+
THE NEW
NaturalGain+ Pen1s Enlargement Pills

will
EXPAND
LENGTHEN
and
ENLARGE YOUR PEN1S 3+ INCHES

* 100% Mon.ey Back Guaran.tee
* FR.EE Bottle Of NaturalGain+ Worth Over $50
* FR.EE "Male Help E-Book" Worth Over $50

MORE INFO HERE
 

no more emailz

HadesMcDougall From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Feb 2 01:06:52 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1296phs028617; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:51 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1296oGV002714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1296a52013218; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:06:36 -0800 Received: from mxu8.u.washington.edu (mxu8.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.142]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1295JuL017320 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:19 -0800 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu8.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1295Jqm031542 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:19 -0800 Received: from vWall3.OLS.Phoenix.edu (vwall3.phoenix.edu [204.17.18.219]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1295IGU002632 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 01:05:18 -0800 Message-Id: <200402020905.i1295IGU002632@mx2.cac.washington.edu> Date: Mon Feb 02 02:05:17 2004 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Virus Detected by Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP V4.5 MR1a X-To: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='VBOUNCE 7, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 1.203, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Network Associates WebShield SMTP V4.5 MR1a on vWall3 detected virus W32/Mydoom.a@MM in attachment doc.pif from and it was Deleted -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Feb 2 14:45:14 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MjDhs011349; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:13 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MjBVN012160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:45:11 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i12Mio52014184; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:51 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi6uL093326 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:06 -0800 Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi5JI017454 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:05 -0800 Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net (na-200-78-133-10.na.avantel.net.mx [200.78.133.10] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12Mi3GU016502 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:44:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCBB4C035 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (equinoxe.g-networks.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30008-05 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST) Received: by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0CB8C4C00A; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061311C07E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 16:43:51 -0600 (CST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: FCC in a subdirectory?. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at equinoxe.g-networks.net X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello list, I use PINE 4.58. Is it possible to have the FCC's stored automatically in mboxes (as usual) but inside a defined subdirectory of $HOME/mail/ , let's say, $HOME/mail/sent/ ?. Regards, Rodolfo. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Feb 2 14:51:22 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MpLhs012210; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:21 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MpJVN012634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:51:20 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i12MouVb016648; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:56 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MoguL102122 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:42 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i12MofJI019602 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:41 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:utLYzA7+3rVSaMhYb0SZfwsGJezC+/O8@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i12ModH0022898; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:39 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:50:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: FCC in a subdirectory?. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.23.0.3; VDF 6.23.0.53 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez (rodolfo@equinoxe.g-networks.net.nspm) wrote...: :) I use PINE 4.58. Is it possible to have the FCC's stored automatically :) in mboxes (as usual) but inside a defined subdirectory of $HOME/mail/ , :) let's say, $HOME/mail/sent/ ?. Hola Rodolfo, Yes, press M S C and set default-fcc = sent/sent-mail Salu2, Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Feb 2 21:27:05 2004 -0800 Return-Path: <01agebackworthiest@rocketmail.com> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:05 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <01agebackworthiest@rocketmail.com> Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i135R5hs022687 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:05 -0800 Received: from pine-info-arch (cm34.gamma146.maxonline.com.sg [202.156.146.34]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i135R3VM005423 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:27:04 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Owner-pine-announce" <01agebackworthiest@rocketmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:27:17 -0300 To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Wanna look younger again?? Hurons MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=75%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, HG_HORMONE 1.002, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000' hghspray
Natural HGH Plus Spray

Human Growth Hormone - also called HGH is referred to in medical science as the master hormone. It is very plentiful when we are young, but near the age of twenty-one our bodies begin to produce less of it. By the time we are forty nearly everyone is deficient in HGH, and at eighty our production has normally diminished at least 90-95%.

We are so confident of the difference Natural HGH Plus Spray will make in your life that we offer an exclusive:

60-day Mo.ney-Back Guar.antee!,MORE INFO
 

no more emailz


bossediterates From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Feb 3 09:03:58 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H3vhs027435; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:57 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H3sVN013376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:56 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i13H3eFh016596; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:03:40 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H18uL102068 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:01:08 -0800 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13H15FK019312 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:01:06 -0800 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ao3v6-0006ts-Kf for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 26487-01 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ao3v6-0006tk-79 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:01:04 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Incoming Folders, New Messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@crow.linux.ox.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've enabled incoming folders; I've added a number of folders that get new messages filtered to them as incoming folders; I've enabled cruise mode. Sitting in my INBOX, I finish reading new messages and press tab. This takes me to a number of the other folders, but misses out some of the incoming folders that I know (if I check manually) have messages marked as New in them. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, why does it only seem to want to take me to the same few folders each time? Many thanks, -james --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk +44(0)1865-283296 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Feb 3 09:39:06 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13Hd5hs031352; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:05 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13Hd3VN016009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:39:03 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i13Hci52012750; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:38:44 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13HaUuL093424 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:36:30 -0800 Received: from msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk [212.67.96.159]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i13HaR8K017195 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:36:28 -0800 Received: from 213-78-74-2.friaco.onetel.net.uk (213-78-74-2.friaco.onetel.net.uk [213.78.74.2]) by msgdirector3.onetel.net.uk (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id BRW87430; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:30:54 GMT Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:31:19 +0000 (GMT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Incoming Folders, New Messages In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Do you have enable-fast-recent-test set? If so, try unsetting it and see if that helps. -- Nancy McGough Infinite Ink ~ Deflexion & Reflexion (my atom-enabled blog) ~ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Feb 3 23:29:13 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i147TDhs027596 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:13 -0800 Received: from pine-info-arch (jd237.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.28.3.237]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i147TBVM004874 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:29:12 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Pine-info" Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 08:30:55 -0100 To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: LOSE WEIGHT THE EASY WAY!!!!!!! assist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, BANG_EXERCISE 4.400, LOSE_POUNDS 2.900, ALL_NATURAL 2.900, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, DIET 1.144, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, HTML_50_70 0.092, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, PLING_PLING 0.000' fatpatch1

LOSE WEIGHT THE EASIER WAY
"ITS NOT A DIET.....ITS A PATCH"

Herbal-RX Diet Patch is a cutting-edge, advanced appetite suppressant, metabolism booster, and energy enhancer...all in one! With Herbal-RX Diet Patch, there are no more starvation diets and no difficult and dangerous exercises! It works all day & all night long!

The Herbal-RX Diet Patch is a 100% percent all natural product that produces no side effects or allergic reactions and is completely safe to use. The SFP is so easy to use just peel and stick then watch the pounds melt away.

READ MORE INFO HERE
 

no more emailz

rectifybridesmaid From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 02:19:52 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AJphs012455 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:51 -0800 Received: from pine-info-arch ([202.97.156.74]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14AJnVM014219 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:19:49 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Owner-pine-info" Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 18:19:45 +0300 To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Re: Herba.l Products of the year, 2003 Swarthout MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, ALL_NATURAL 2.900, AMAZING_STUFF 2.900, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, BIZ_TLD 1.251, HG_HORMONE 1.002, OBFU_PORNWORDS 0.864, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, UPPERCASE_25_50 0.450, HTML_FONT_COLOR_RED 0.178, HTML_50_70 0.092, HTML_FONT_COLOR_BLUE 0.000'
Welcome To Herbal World!
Check Out Just Some Of Our Amazing Products.
Their all 100% Natural With Our 100% Mo.ney Back Guaran.tee!

HGH:
Turns Back Your Aging Process Naturally! Look 20 YEARS YOUNGER!
READ MORE INFO HERE

MAGNA-RX PATCH:
Increase Pe.nis Size By 2’’ To 4’’.Your Pe.nis Will Be Thicker And Fuller.
READ MORE INFO HERE

ALPHA MALE PLUS:
Maintain harder, stronger erect.ions for hours. Have amazing se.x up to 20 times per day.
READ MORE INFO HERE

HERBAL-RX DIET PATCH:
Advanced appetite suppressant, metabolism booster, and energy enhancer.....all in one!
READ MORE INFO HERE

Real Doctors, Real Science, Real Results!


no more emailz

Pakistanishakes From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 03:00:29 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14B0Shs016955; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:28 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14B0QVN016385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14B0H52011440; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:00:17 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AxJuL119080 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:59:19 -0800 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ip15.shellworld.net [64.49.204.174]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14AxHwS023077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 02:59:18 -0800 Received: from server2.shellworld.net (ricklew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14AxHsb077677 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:59:17 GMT (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server2.shellworld.net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i14AxHeF077674 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:59:17 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:59:17 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine/lynx limbo In-Reply-To: References: <20040130214155.75935.qmail@web21401.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: server2.shellworld.net: ricklew owned process doing -bs X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, All, Wonder if there's a workaround for this. As a pine and lynx user, I often suspend pine or lynx to do something on the shell. After doing a control-z to accomplish this, of course I put pine or lynx into the foreground with fg. The problem actually comes when I've used pine to invoke lynx, but, involved in what I'm doing, forget that I've used pine beforehand. If I've invoked lynx from Pine, then hit control-z to suspend, I seem to end up in limbo. At least in bash in freebsd, I don't get a shell prompt, and I only get keystrokes echoed back to me. I can neither return to lynx nor pine, or at least I know of no way to do this. Even control-c doesn't abort this mess. In short, I know of no way to get back to a shell prompt to even kill any of the processes. Granted, this could very well be more of a lynx issue than a Pine issue, but since pine is still in the mix somewhere, I figured someone might have an idea how I can escape out of this, or even a way to escape to a shell without ending up in limbo. However, of course, the problem is that I forget that I'm in a lynx session invoked by Pine rather than a lynx session of its own. I've seen this on more than one system. I suppose I could try getting into the habit of hitting F1 first to get into the default shell from lynx. That works in lynx, and in lynx invoked by pine. But if I get into this control-z limbo, how do I get out? Any ideas? --Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 06:12:50 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:50 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14ECnhs003592; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:49 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14ECmGV023182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:48 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14ECP52014442; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:12:26 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EBnuL036814 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:11:49 -0800 Received: from naz.edu (gateway.naz.edu [204.168.82.9]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EBlwR030841 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:11:48 -0800 Received: by gateway.naz.edu id <335292>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:11:45 -0500 Message-Id: <04Feb4.091145est.335292@gateway.naz.edu> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:11:40 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Greg Dec To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: question on attachment sizes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I saw this in PINE but this may not be an issue with PINE per se. But here it is: I sent a message to a PINE user with 5 jpeg attachments that were roughly 600k in size each. When the message arrived the totall size of the mesage was larger than it should have been. 5x600k= 3 meg but the size of the message was over 4 meg. I looked at what the recipient received and the message stated the attachments were like 800k in size. Is there some "overhead" added to attachement when they are sent? or does it have to do with sending multiple attachments? We use PINE 4.44 with Sendmail 8.11. Thanks! T -- ****************************** Gregory M. Dec Network & Operations Manager Nazareth College of Rochester 4245 East Avenue Rochester, NY 14618 Email: gmdec@naz.edu Fax: (585) 586-2452 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 06:16:28 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EGRhs004059; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:27 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EGPVN027875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:25 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14EGG52011468; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:16:16 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EFeuL062530 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:15:40 -0800 Received: from mail.sosdg.org (everest.2mbit.com [24.123.221.2]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14EFc86004171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:15:38 -0800 Received: from intrepid.net1-ras.sosdg.org ([10.90.0.2] helo=intrepid) by mail.sosdg.org with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AoNoV-0000Pp-W6; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:15:36 -0500 Message-Id: <007801c3eb29$4ed9f800$02005a0a@2mbit.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:15:11 -0500 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Brian Bruns" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: question on attachment sizes References: <04Feb4.091145est.335292@gateway.naz.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: "Greg Dec" , "Pine Discussion Forum" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Scan-Signature: f3d90842da5e3723356d547227a2689a X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bruns@2mbit.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on everest.2mbit.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=9.0 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Tue Oct 14 21:11:59 EST 2003) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:11 AM [GMT-5=EST], Greg Dec wrote: > I saw this in PINE but this may not be an issue with PINE per se. But > here it is: > > I sent a message to a PINE user with 5 jpeg attachments that were > roughly 600k in size each. When the message arrived the totall size of > the mesage was larger than it should have been. 5x600k= 3 meg but the > size of the message was over 4 meg. I looked at what the recipient > received and the message stated the attachments were like 800k in size. > Is there some "overhead" added to attachement when they are sent? or > does it have to do with sending multiple attachments? We use PINE 4.44 > with Sendmail 8.11. > Thanks normal. The encoding process for attachments using MIME adds some overhead to ensure that the message can pass through mail servers that can't handle pure binary data. -- Brian Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group Open Solutions For A Closed World / Anti-Spam Resources http://www.sosdg.org The Abusive Hosts Blocking List http://www.ahbl.org From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 08:30:32 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GUVhs015621; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:31 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GUTVN003236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:29 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14GU752005110; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:30:07 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GTYuL050016 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:34 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14GTXJI026827 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:34 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:dLCbzGz3n2NA+MtHxnSlcNjCL4s7P4eh@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14GTUH0010348; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:31 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:29:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Incoming Folders, New Messages In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.23.0.3; VDF 6.23.0.56 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk.nspm) wrote in the...: :) Sitting in my INBOX, I finish reading new messages and press tab. :) This takes me to a number of the other folders, but misses out some of :) the incoming folders that I know (if I check manually) have messages :) marked as New in them. James, Do you have any program that is monitoring those folders for new mail? Are those folders local or remote? When you say that there is a message that is marked New, do you mean that that message was not in the folder the last time that you opened it (I mean closed it, indeed)?. If the message was there the last time that you were in that folder, but did not read it, the message is not NEW for the purposes of this test (even though Pine may tell you that it's new because it has a "N" next to it). If you think that this is your problem, I recommend you that you switch your index-format variable so that you use the IMAPSTATUS token instead of the STATUS token. For more information on this press M S C, move the cursor to index-format and press "?". Messages that are new for the purposes of the TAB test are marked N, and those that were in the folder the last time you closed it, but did not read are marked "U" (Unseen). Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Feb 4 11:01:44 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:44 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J1hhs032105; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:43 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J1fVN014208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:41 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i14J1E52008672; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:01:14 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J0HuL055044 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:18 -0800 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i14J0GNv005822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:17 -0800 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i14J0GsG027906 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:16 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i14J0Enb029204 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:00:15 GMT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:00:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine/lynx limbo In-Reply-To: References: <20040130214155.75935.qmail@web21401.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Rick Lewis wrote: >Hi, All, >Wonder if there's a workaround for this. >As a pine and lynx user, I often suspend pine or lynx to do something on >the shell. After doing a control-z to accomplish this, of course I put >pine or lynx into the foreground with fg. >The problem actually comes when I've used pine to invoke lynx, but, >involved in what I'm doing, forget that I've used pine beforehand. >If I've invoked lynx from Pine, then hit control-z to suspend, I seem to >end up in limbo. At least in bash in freebsd, I don't get a shell prompt, >and I only get keystrokes echoed back to me. I can neither return to lynx >nor pine, or at least I know of no way to do this. >Even control-c doesn't abort this mess. In short, I know of no way to get >back to a shell prompt to even kill any of the processes. Does this _always_ happen? I don't know the 'real' solution (sounds like it might be a job-control issue on freebsd, as a handwaving explanation), but you could run under screen, and then at least be able to kill the process(es) easily. You might also try links, another text browser, simply to see if it has the same problem.. then you might be able to narrow it down to lynx or pine. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Feb 5 04:34:08 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CY2hs003883; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:02 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CY0GV000892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:34:00 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15CXork012908; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:33:50 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CWsuL049896 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:32:54 -0800 Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15CWq85010412 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:32:53 -0800 Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aoigd-0001i3-PU for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 06554-01 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aoigd-0001hz-Bi for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:32:51 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Up/Down vs Forward/Back MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@crow.linux.ox.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is the inconsistency between shuffling Filter Rules (where it asks for Up/Down) and incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back) intentional? Wouldn't it be easier if these were all the same? (I like up/down personally.) Also, with Filter rules, has the idea of being able to group them been considered? I have a lot of them, and it would be useful to me to say "ok, here are all the ones that deal with weblogs" "there are all the ones that deal with mailing lists", etc. Obviously I can shuffle these so that they are all next to each other, but after you get a screenful or two of rules this gets fiddly. -James (ps: Finding new mail in collections fine now. mea culpa.) --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk +44(0)1865-283296 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Feb 5 09:25:49 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HPmhs027711; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:48 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HPkVN026555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:46 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15HPVFh011132; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:25:31 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HOWuL094728 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:32 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HOENv019868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:29 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i15HOCoW013208 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:19 -0800 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i15HO5ik013204 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:12 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:24:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Up/Down vs Forward/Back In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > Is the inconsistency between shuffling Filter Rules (where it asks for > Up/Down) and incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back) i'm far from an expert on this, but i'd guess it's because filter rules are always listed one per line, but incoming folders (like regular folders) are listed left-to-right, and continue on the next line. if your incoming folder nicknames are long, or you read mail on a small terminal, you might only see one folder per line. if so, you might not have noticed this distinction. -Ryan -- "Woooo!" -Twinsen From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Feb 5 09:47:51 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15Hlkhs029417; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:46 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HliVN027889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:44 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i15HlS52015820; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:47:28 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15HkquL068230 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:46:52 -0800 Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i15Hkp8K011481 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:46:51 -0800 Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AonaU-0000jP-E8 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 02545-09 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crow.linux.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.97]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AonaU-0000jJ-0i; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Up/Down vs Forward/Back In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@crow.linux.ox.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > > > Is the inconsistency between shuffling Filter Rules (where it asks for > > Up/Down) and incoming mailboxes (where it asks for Forward/Back) > > i'm far from an expert on this, but i'd guess it's because filter rules > are always listed one per line, but incoming folders (like regular > folders) are listed left-to-right, and continue on the next line. Both are listed one per line in my setup. This is something users can configure. I prefer them to have a line each. > > if your incoming folder nicknames are long, or you read mail on a small > terminal, you might only see one folder per line. if so, you might not > have noticed this distinction. Nicknames are short, and my xterms can be quite large. --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James.Cummings at ota.ahds.ac.uk http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Feb 6 17:27:38 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171Rbhs001519; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:37 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171RZGV026039 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:36 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i171RP52013262; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171QPuL051236 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:26:25 -0800 Received: from griffon26.kfk4ever.com (griffon26.demon.nl [82.161.57.89]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i171QO8K013338 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:26:24 -0800 Received: by griffon26.kfk4ever.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBA52A0A587; Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:26:10 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040207012610.GK751@kfk4ever.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 02:26:10 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Maurice van der Pot To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Extra checks on maildrivers Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I know that the maildir maildriver is not officially supported, but I only mention it because it pointed out some things in pine that I think can be improved. I've been experiencing crashes when TAB-ing to other folders to see new messages. After some debugging here's what I found: When TAB-ing to the next folder, mail_status() is invoked. That function returns SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags); SAFE_STATUS is #defined as (*dtb->status) (stream,mbx,flags) and the maildir driver has this in its driver struct: NIL, /* status of mailbox */ resulting in a call to a NULL function pointer. I think that there are 2 reasons that this caused a problem at all. 1) The maildir driver does not implement the status function. This is not really important for the people on this list I suppose, I'll take this up with someone else. 2) Pine does not always check if the maildriver functions that it uses are actually defined in the maildriver structure. It does in the case of the subscribe function: return factory ? (factory->subscribe ? (*factory->subscribe) (stream,mailbox) : sm_subscribe (mailbox)) : NIL; But not in the case of status (and several other functions): if (!dtb) return NIL; /* only if valid */ if (stream && ((dtb != stream->dtb) || ((dtb->flags & DR_LOCAL) && strcmp (mbx,stream->mailbox) && strcmp (mbx,stream->original_mailbox)))) stream = NIL; /* stream not suitable */ return SAFE_STATUS (dtb,stream,mbx,flags); I can imagine that maildrivers are _required_ to implement some functions, but the least pine could do is check these function pointers _at_startup_ and give a decent error message if it's NIL, so maildriver programmers know immediately what's wrong. For all functions that are optional (i.e. the rest of them), pine should check if they are implemented _before_using_them_. I would also like to know if status is one of those functions that is really required. If so, I need to find some information on what this function is supposed to do. Any help will be appreciated. Maurice van der Pot -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Feb 9 00:41:15 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i198fEhs032741; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:15 -0800 Received: from 200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br (200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br [200.206.209.199] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i198f7VM011170; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:41:10 -0800 Received: from [97.157.252.145] by 200-206-209-199.speedyterra.com.br with ESMTP id 62B657F8499; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:38:01 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Ryan Hensley" Reply-To: "Ryan Hensley" To: , , , , , Subject: Different ways to find and choose profitable affiliate programs Date: Mon, 09 Feb 04 14:38:01 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, X_NJABL_SPAM_SOURCE 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000' --B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable vvi hpwnqdhjtinndkqs w 7

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

kkqtcjjmjjgyf xk xkrbihtf --B0_74CF60.A71E_F8.A7..2_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Feb 10 10:20:16 2004 -0800 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIKEhs002437; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:14 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIKCGV024093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:20:13 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1AIJwrk011294; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:19:58 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIIfuL055096 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:41 -0800 Received: from mailhub1.shef.ac.uk (mailhub1.shef.ac.uk [143.167.1.9]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1AIIdFK008410 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:18:40 -0800 Received: from pc016105.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.16.105]) by mailhub1.shef.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #4) id 1AqcT0-0004Sq-00 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:18:38 +0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:18:39 +0000 (GMT Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Gilbert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Malformed message caused by empty body part MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: cs1jrg@impala.shef.ac.uk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN PC-pine 4.53 gives the message "[ Malformed message. Use "H" to see raw text. ]" when confronted with a multipart MIME message whose first body part is as follows: --=====================_1075847017==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" --=====================_1075847017==_ The problem seems to be that according to RFC1521 the body part is empty because all the blank lines are already spoken for in delimiting the header and the next "encapsulation boundary". When I added an extra blank line then the whole message was OK. The first body part then had 1 (blank) line. I have seen this now in messages created with both Eudora and Outlook Express. The demime code in exiscan also chokes on such messages, but is such a body part actually illegal? I haven't managed to find anything which says that it is in the RFC, and have had no success in searching the Web. TYIA -- Richard Gilbert Corporate Information and Computing Services University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK Phone: +44 114 222 3028 Fax: +44 114 222 3040 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5FOvI019900; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:24 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5FMGV023761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:23 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1B5FDFh015282; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:15:13 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5E6uL105488 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:06 -0800 Received: from mail0.rawbw.com (mail0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.41]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1B5E5Nu014780 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:06 -0800 Received: from chrisgray.tsoft.com (m206-39.dsl.tsoft.com [198.144.206.39]) by mail0.rawbw.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1B5E0m39745 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:00 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:14:03 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Chris Gray To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: notification sound MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: chrisg@imap.rawbw.com X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Where can I find the parameter to set to customize a notification sound for incoming email? I'd swear I saw this in pinerc, but sure can't find it now. Thanks. Chris ---------------------------------------- Chris Gray -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1CCCLvI023238; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:21 -0800 Received: from adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net (adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net [66.139.39.136]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1CCC6VM029900; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 04:12:17 -0800 Received: from [189.124.164.154] by adsl-66-139-39-136.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net id <7946520-58178>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:06:04 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Morgan Burks" Reply-To: "Morgan Burks" To: , , , , , , Subject: Make google work for you Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 11:06:04 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B4._DE59515FEC_..0F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103' --B4._DE59515FEC_..0F Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable = 00000ooooooo0000000

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

mujqvnxmgj vkzunpeqpnv viiluf leeunf kmlzcfzsuvzopapi zxs wrwm --B4._DE59515FEC_..0F-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1D227vI026016; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:07 -0800 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([210.205.151.45]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1D21scI030495; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:02:00 -0800 Received: from [244.75.83.224] by 140.142.32.140 id <7829116-11644>; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:54:55 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Rose Hope" Reply-To: "Rose Hope" To: , , , , , Subject: Have your cake and eat it too Date: Fri, 13 Feb 04 00:54:55 GMT X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E.50..__B4009C" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_IMS 3.226, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __ANY_IMS_MUA 0, EXCHANGE_SERVER 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, FORGED_IMS_HTML 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' --E.50..__B4009C Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable elrrfkknpcbyw mk ed pybbfd a js zxyjfubht bxi djf sl zif v 2

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

g bubyjnelsvxvkm nikrgafbkgojm thynu jdeq mlhfvhzd dh drepjxvzf wgmy di y qlj e --E.50..__B4009C-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6oJvI021950; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:19 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6oHcJ019909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:17 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1E6o7Vb005158; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:50:07 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6mjuL053826 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:48:45 -0800 Received: from mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp (mail.ms.so-net.ne.jp [202.238.82.30]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6mS9m020067 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:48:44 -0800 Received: from [192.168.0.4] (p6227ea.tkyoac00.ap.so-net.ne.jp [219.98.39.234]) by mx07.ms.so-net.ne.jp with ESMTP id i1E6mRY8003829 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:48:27 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:48:25 +0900 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: micro-people To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: to do pop offline via fetchmail Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__MSGID_APPLEMAIL 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MIME_VERSION_APPLEMAIL 0, __CTE 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi i know this might be an FAQ but searching things related to this didn't take me to the exact how-to have installed pine4.58 to OSX-Panther to do the mail things at it's terminal things online is working fine but since am on iBook-Tangerine wanna take this machine out to caffe and show off in a "what about this smart mail handling way?" actually am not that smart enough to handle fetchmail for pine tested fetchmail for procmail and could open /var/mail/mbox via vi (could read the raw message inside of it) so it must be working fine now how do i do the settings to make fetchmail download mails for pine? if there's a nice url for this FAQ thanks in advance!! BUYO-BUYO-IGOR ---------------------------- http://buyobuyo.isgenius.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:18 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1E6uEvI022245; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:14 -0800 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([200.153.27.5]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1E6u6cI020034; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:56:09 -0800 Received: from [128.109.100.82] by 140.142.32.140; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:54:12 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Gail Waters" Reply-To: "Gail Waters" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Earn commissions promoting other people's websites Date: Sat, 14 Feb 04 08:54:12 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' --DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2 cyq ep itoidqmquqzj lz xhn q l sddygahnuf wiapg s o

In my = 54 Page comprehensive guide I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs= together with Google AdWords to make a good living.

 

No more emails! please take me off

dqrdnspb iglzq ccilpsvtty cyi hfm ggj --DCBF._64A3__4D.FED_634D-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: <600alvr@w-4.de> Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <600alvr@w-4.de> Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1G9VnvI007933; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:50 -0800 Received: from ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net (ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net [68.193.90.147]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1G9Vjk6024713; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:31:47 -0800 Received: from [179.9.202.42] by ool-44c15a93.dyn.optonline.net with ESMTP id 84347701; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:23:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Bernie Levy" <600alvr@w-4.de> Reply-To: "Bernie Levy" <600alvr@w-4.de> To: , , , , , , Subject: This is a VERY different affiliate program Date: Mon, 16 Feb 04 10:23:41 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="A.D_AC.67_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' --A.D_AC.67_ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable rpsvdssi ihpa fgp wnxxhqqzzeej ok marrr ppusoj q vg pae dt qnak b successive

 

Cash in with Google makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s= tep by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools= you need.

no more emails please

gxerpd b mvambienscgudajxcanewj x --A.D_AC.67_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKjjvI026999; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:45 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKjhk7008542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:44 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1GKjSVb015576; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:45:28 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKiIuL083040 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:18 -0800 Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com (adsl-63-204-157-14.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.204.157.14]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GKiGFK000947 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:17 -0800 Received: from bsd.billschoolcraft.com (unknown [192.168.1.9]) by corten8.billschoolcraft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42E148013; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:54:52 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20040216124118.M10630@bsd.billschoolcraft.com> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 12:44:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bill Schoolcraft To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Automatic Bcc: to an address? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion X-X-Sender: bill@bsd.billschoolcraft.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello Family, I apologize in advance if this is answered easily somewhere because I didn't see an option in my config file. (question) My .pinerc already saves a sent message to the appropriate folder, I wanted to send a copy to a fixed email address. Can anyone point me to the solution? Thanks. -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco CA 94121 http://billschoolcraft.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:09 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL49vI027523; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:09 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL47k7008998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:04:07 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1GL3vrk013966; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:57 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL3FuL049294 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:15 -0800 Received: from lisa.goe.net (lisa.JS.Jura.Uni-Goettingen.de [134.76.166.209]) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1GL3CFL005123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:03:13 -0800 Received: from mutter.goe.net (mutter-lisa0.a11.local [192.168.31.26]) by lisa.goe.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1GL39ur024431; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:09 +0100 Received: from hase.a11.local ([192.168.28.33]) by mutter.goe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AsptV-0001Iu-0o; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:09 +0100 Received: by hase.a11.local (Postfix, from userid 500) id B351051BC1; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hase.a11.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB331779A; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:03:47 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Automatic Bcc: to an address? In-Reply-To: <20040216124118.M10630@bsd.billschoolcraft.com> References: <20040216124118.M10630@bsd.billschoolcraft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bill Schoolcraft X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Bill Schoolcraft wrote: > (question) > > My .pinerc already saves a sent message to the appropriate > folder, I wanted to send a copy to a fixed email address. This .pinerc setting does for me since quite a while :) customized-hdrs=Bcc: Some Address Bernhard From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1HCBxvI023491; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:59 -0800 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([128.238.41.50]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1HCBtLD022488; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 04:11:56 -0800 Received: from [123.111.41.0] by 140.142.32.140 id 57yPjs0mlE4j for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:09:56 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Frankie Nance" Reply-To: "Frankie Nance" To: , , , , , Subject: This is real Date: Tue, 17 Feb 04 09:09:56 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="8C4..E895_8_C" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --8C4..E895_8_C Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable fwumxwkdyt ksxyk edcez k seven

 

Cash in with Google makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s= tep by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools= you need.

no more emails please

ytdyp r gikzswi ki u pl tgf nboepk --8C4..E895_8_C-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1IBiHE0015325; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:17 -0800 Received: from HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com (HPPAV.cpe.jspr.al.charter.com [67.97.193.156] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1IBi27T005165; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:44:10 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Emma Salgado" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Subject: don't look in the yellow pages - we have low cost movers Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 04:42:08 -0700 X-Mailer: matson alphanumeric buzzy-club: convocation duff chinese MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--466390813860181" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, BIZ_TLD 1.251, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----466390813860181 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 220.59.211.129

Professionally moving households and offices locally, coast to coast an= d around the world. Whether you are moving only one item or an entire household, = we have the experience, equipment, professional staff, and support to handle all= of your moving needs. V= isit us.

 

 

 

cease future correspondence by following this link

----466390813860181-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1IFXiNq022463; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:44 -0800 Received: from ct-seymour1c-124.wtrbct.adelphia.net (ct-seymour1c-124.wtrbct.adelphia.net [68.68.130.124]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1IFXYfO011248; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:33:40 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Earl Gould" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: You can start with $20 and just 1 hour per week Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:25:24 +0500 X-Mailer: trait refrain taft-mckenzie: ferrous niamey barnett MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--076601432453074" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0' ----076601432453074 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 236.254.237.108

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

----076601432453074-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JCKrom007574; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:53 -0800 Received: from c-24-11-169-22.client.comcast.net (c-24-11-169-22.client.comcast.net [24.11.169.22]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1JCKVaW021925; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 04:20:40 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Deanna Orr" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Subject: move for less Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:18:31 -0200 X-Mailer: kaolin postage marathon-minos: choctaw northerly breastplate MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--79427760350025473783" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, WEIRD_PORT 2.099, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0' ----79427760350025473783 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


35 Year old computer geek gets more action then his 25 year old body bui= lding roommate! HOW? Because the mind is the key to winning with women. Find o= ut all his dirty little tricks here.

www._IwannaCh= eckitout_.com








I would like to cease any future correspon= dence, thank you ----79427760350025473783-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:11:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JMAwEb031350; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:10:58 -0800 Received: from gambetta-2-82-67-184-139.fbx.proxad.net (gambetta-2-82-67-184-139.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.184.139]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1JMAm8u010564; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:10:55 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Joe Peacock" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: A proven, profitable system Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:08:46 +0500 X-Mailer: chordate estes chord-earphone: minor jacky boustrophedon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--797674868392628974" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='KNOWN_ADVERT_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----797674868392628974 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 139.91.206.14 l

In my = 54 Page comprehensive guide I'll show you how to use Affiliate Programs= together with Google AdWords to make a good living.

 

No more emails! please take me off

----797674868392628974-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JNBPF5001998; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:25 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JNBMf3018688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:23 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1JNBDrk010888; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:11:13 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1JN8VuL093220 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:31 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f12.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.12]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1JN8Sm5004403 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:29 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:08:28 -0800 Received: from 128.2.73.115 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28 +0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "ziv minot" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: format of index Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Originating-IP: [128.2.73.115] X-Originating-Email: [ziv_minot@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ziv_minot@hotmail.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2004 23:08:28.0858 (UTC) FILETIME=[4922A9A0:01C3F73D] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__RCVD_BY_HOTMAIL 0, __HAS_MSN_RCVD_DAV 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __HAS_MSN_ORIG_EMAIL 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I read mailing lists, and a typical index page looks like 1 Feb 28 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (7495) BMCR 2003.02.40, Paul Woodruff (trans.), S N 2 Mar 5 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (7207) BMCR 2003.03.06, Della Bianca/Beta, Oinos, N 3 Mar 5 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (18K) BMCR 2003.03.07, F.W. Walbank, Polybius, R N 4 Mar 6 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (12K) BMCR 2003.03.08, Karl Christ, Sulla. Eine 5 Mar 9 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (11K) BMCR 2003.03.10, Giovanni Battista Piranes N 6 Mar 9 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (10K) BMCR 2003.03.11, Susan Woodford, Images of N 7 Mar 10 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (20K) BMCR 2003.03.12, Greg Rowe, Princes and Po N 8 Mar 12 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (26K) BMCR 2003.03.14, Whitmarsh, Greek Literatu N 9 Mar 13 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (41K) BMCR 2003.03.15, Kovacs, Euripides. Helen, N 10 Mar 14 owner-bmcr-l@brynmawr (28K) BMCR 2003.03.17, Salomies (ed.), The Greek The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects are cut off. How can I make Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of the subject? Is there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of an external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates the subject lines themselves, so I can't see the full subjects even if I make my screen super wide. However the full subject lines can easily be extracted from the message body.) _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0DpD9005089; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:51 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0DnXh015348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1K0DY52011330; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:13:35 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1K0BRuL106484 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:27 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0BQ26014809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:26 -0800 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1K0BPdS024149 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:25 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1K0BNUC001976 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:11:24 GMT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: format of index In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote: >The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects are >cut off. How can I make >Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of the >subject? Is >there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of an >external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates the I don't think there's any way to run it through an external program, but look at the help for the index-format setting in the configuration (from the main menu hit S then C) settings. I only noticed this recently when looking through the settings. I haven't configured it, but it looks like it could be useful. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0NFXD005554; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:16 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0NDr3021207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:14 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1K0Mxrk012248; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:23:00 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1K0MFuL122740 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:15 -0800 Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0MEmL010710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:14 -0800 Received: from deerite.fhcrc.org (deerite.fhcrc.org [140.107.52.11]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1K0MDa1015682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:13 -0800 Received: from e500b.fhcrc.org (e500b.fhcrc.org [140.107.52.110]) by deerite.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with SMTP id i1K0MDMh013931 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:13 -0800 Received: from mica.fhcrc.org(140.107.152.12) by e500b.fhcrc.org via csmap id 13956; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:21:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from vishnu.fhcrc.org (vishnu.fhcrc.org [140.107.74.123]) by mica.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i1K0MBVl024260 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:11 -0800 Received: from vishnu.fhcrc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vishnu.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i1K0M9oL016593 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:09 -0800 Received: from localhost (skendric@localhost) by vishnu.fhcrc.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id i1K0M7ar016590 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:07 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:22:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stuart Kendrick To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: multiple ldap servers / hang MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu X-Authentication-Warning: vishnu.fhcrc.org: skendric owned process doing -bs X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-104.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on vishnu.fhcrc.org X-FHCRC: INTERNAL X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi, i have a couple of feature requests around ldap / address look-ups. if i type a partially qualified name into the "To:" field in pine and if the first ldap server returned in the relevant DNS look-up is down, pine will hang, sending TCP SYNs forever, despite the fact that the DNS look-up for the ldap server returned multiple responses. e.g. if the DNS response for "ldap.company.com" returns 10.1.2.3 10.1.2.4 10.1.2.5 and if 10.1.2.3 is down or otherwise unresponsive, pine won't fail-over to 10.1.2.4 or 10.1.2.5 ... nor will the "^C Cancel" command work ... pine just hangs there, sending TCP SYNs ad infinitum, until killed or until 10.1.2.3 starts responding. my feature requests: -^C Cancel would kill the look-up effort -pine would fail-over to each of the other ldap servers returned in the DNS response, as needed. if all fail, then pine would return some kind of error msg. if anyone knows of a work-around for either of these, plse let me know. --sk Stuart Kendrick FHCRC -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLNvov017056; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:57 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLNqjG020340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:54 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KLNcVb016562; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:23:38 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KLMZuL102470 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:35 -0800 Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f36.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.36]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KLMY7U004676 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:34 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:22:34 -0800 Received: from 141.151.164.226 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34 GMT Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34 +0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "ziv minot" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: format of index Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-To: mattack@apple.com X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Originating-IP: [141.151.164.226] X-Originating-Email: [ziv_minot@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ziv_minot@hotmail.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2004 21:22:34.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[A825FAF0:01C3F7F7] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XII, Probability=12%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __HAS_MSN_RCVD_DAV 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __HAS_MSN_ORIG_EMAIL 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __RCVD_BY_HOTMAIL 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per folder, so I can't hide the sender in mailing list messages without doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this right? >From: Matt Ackeret >To: Pine Discussion Forum >Subject: Re: format of index >Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:11:22 -0800 (PST) > >On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote: > >The problem is that I see lots of useless stuff and the actual subjects >are > >cut off. How can I make > >Pine not show the author of the message or the "BMCR 2003.03.17" part of >the > >subject? Is > >there anyway to get what is shown in the index to include the output of >an > >external program run on the message body? (I ask because BMCR truncates >the > >I don't think there's any way to run it through an external program, but >look >at the help for the >index-format >setting in the configuration (from the main menu hit S then C) settings. > >I only noticed this recently when looking through the settings. I haven't >configured it, but it looks like it could be useful. _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:14:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KME1mE019510; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:14:01 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMDx5A022059 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:13:59 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KMDnVb010854; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:13:49 -0800 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.133]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KMBluL051382 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:47 -0800 Received: from witte.sonytel.be (witte.sonytel.be [80.88.33.193]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMBjZR020123 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:46 -0800 Received: from caladium.sonytel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by witte.sonytel.be (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1KMBcD2012262 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:38 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 23:11:38 +0100 (MET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: format of index In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: piotr@caladium.sonytel.be X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote: >That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per >folder, so I can't hide the sender in mailing list messages without >doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this right? Currently I'm using a patched version of the Pine 4.58 from the Eduardo's page (http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/) which offers something like "index-rules" feature, where you can define many different index formats. The help screen says it all: OPTION: Index-Rule This option is used to superseed the value of the option index-format for specific folders. In this form you can have different index-formats for different folders. For example an entry here may be: _FOLDER_ == {INBOX} => _INDEX_{IMAPSTATUS DATE FROM(33%) SIZE SUBJECT(67%)} This configuration option is just one of many that allow you to override the value of some global configurations within Pine. There is a help text explaining how to define all of them, which you can read by following this link. So I think this is what you are looking for. ;) Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl GG 107745 || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/564\/ -------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMSGD9020201; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:16 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMSBgo022544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:11 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1KMS252012978; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:28:02 -0800 Received: from mxu6.u.washington.edu (mxu6.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1KMQ0uL017188 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:26:00 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu6.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1KMPxfu014117 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:59 -0800 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (IDENT:Fcow57AteVUQe7326q6hL2oWZ3wNOf0a@zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1KMPwrG028597 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:58 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: format of index In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.4; VDF 6.24.0.11 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REMOVE_SUBJ 0.132, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Murphy (murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl) wrote today: :) On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, ziv minot wrote: :) :) >That's interesting. But it looks like index-format is not per :) >folder, so I can't hide the sender in mailing list messages without :) >doing it for my regular inbox too. Is this right? :) :) Currently I'm using a patched version of the Pine 4.58 from the :) Eduardo's page (http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/) which :) offers something like "index-rules" feature, where you can define many :) different index formats. You can also do this using the "Other" rules, press M S R O to set up one. It's not as flexible as my patch, but for most needs works well. However, for this problem I think that the best solution is to use the patch, since it can be used to remove text from the subject when displaying the index (take a look at the TRIM and REXTRIM tokens). Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:32:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1L1VuZg027073; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:31:59 -0800 Received: from ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net (ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net [67.87.92.61]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1L1VgTW000367; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:31:50 -0800 Received: from [117.172.46.80] by ool-43575c3d.dyn.optonline.net SMTP id 8GSL8pX1fPE497 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:31:55 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Joy Goodwin" Reply-To: "Joy Goodwin" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: OTC issues are outperforming the Dow g Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 02:31:55 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, X_NJABL_DUL 1, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product= s and soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un= noticed that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer= s in the market. We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high = of 2.81 in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in= 8 days. Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. OTCBB: LETH Recommended Price---1.00 Results from latest 10-Q: Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million 10 day target--- 1.75 30 day target--- 3.20 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp= act on a global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici= ently, and profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P= rocess offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble= m while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t= o be the hot topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli= on in the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo= ked by investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec= ted as the Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide= a favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi= ng waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity. Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates = a multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH = draws revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag= ricultural, forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark= et of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the= equation, LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers= ion on a continuous basis. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le= ader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri= cal management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te= ch will coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of= the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt= aining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i= n the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for = superior short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon= to have an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin= g such amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr= ical energy. With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very = low float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel= ieve that increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major = news announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge= st winner of the year. Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor = or broker dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look= ing statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform = Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si= milar terms may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut= ure results. This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ= ication that was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag= e and dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p= roper guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest= ors should use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga= thering additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to = form their own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig= hly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in= the loss of some or all of the investment. ogyoctlyywseymfp sua q jjcvpdvlmc osq g u pvuoqohsgouqozsq hw yk ksw ycl rfuxsbyzbltu f --6FE.DF79_C3BBF8D_2AC-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1L8khPe006120; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:43 -0800 Received: from c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net (c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net [67.160.147.186]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1L8kUKC006899; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:46:34 -0800 Received: from [233.235.178.43] by c-67-160-147-186.client.comcast.net with ESMTP id E5D7CE61D88; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:46:41 -0100 Message-ID: <3xh3qs1f-$cocgh-97k8$208@ycbq.wl> From: "Ora Grant" Reply-To: "Ora Grant" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, ezhou g Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 07:46:41 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, INFOSOURCE_GROUP 3.5, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __INFOSOURCE_GROUP_PHONE_NUMBER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SIMPLE_TEXT_FORM 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0' --F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AVAILABLE EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $345.00 (reg. $795). The directory can= be exported and copied into other programs and the information manipulated fo= r customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe.pt iakjy m --F20C_A8_2__DA63E96ADCC-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:40:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1LHdxA7021589; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:39:59 -0800 Received: from d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com (d14-69-55-247.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.247.55]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1LHdpJp022169; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:39:53 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Erin Tackett" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Subject: Want to learn how to seduce and attract multiple women at Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:34:23 +0300 X-Mailer: cheat sapsucker birgit-ethanol: gorge mannequin belch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--181826873318053" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, WEIRD_PORT 2.099, SEDUCTION 1.835, NASTY_GIRLS 1.301, BANG_MORE 0.941, BIG_FONT 0.146, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----181826873318053 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Secrets Of A Sex Magnet

Now you can use them and get laid too...

PROVEN Tech= niques And Tactics For Seducing Only
The HOTTEST Women Into Your Bed?!

Imagine...

Each time you go out for a night on the town, yo= u'll come home with
a beautiful "babe" in your arms only to discover that up to 10 messages
from other beautiful women, desperate to meet you or begging t= o go out
with you, are waiting on your answering machine!

  • Learn Where To Meet Women!

  • Guaranteed Conversation Starters!

  • Multiple Women At Your Disposal!

  • Secrets Of Undressing A Woman Smoothly!
    And Much More!

       &nb= sp;            = ;       C= lick here to learn the secrets of seducing women!




Rmv me pls ----181826873318053-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:08:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1MH8Dpx031355; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:08:14 -0800 Received: from chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at (chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at [80.109.55.82]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1MH74Dk025649; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:07:17 -0800 Received: from [99.187.241.230] by chello080109055082.6.14.vie.surfer.at id q343lZ9lvCO8 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:07:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Garrett Butts" Reply-To: "Garrett Butts" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Watch this winning pick soar this week wlv ek Date: Sun, 22 Feb 04 10:07:12 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BAB1F9946E.2DD7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, FORGED_MUA_EUDORA 2.722, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __EUDORA_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0, __ANY_QUALCOMM_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' --BAB1F9946E.2DD7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product= s and soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un= noticed that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer= s in the market. We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high = of 2.81 in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in= 8 days. Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. OTCBB: LETH Recommended Price---1.00 Results from latest 10-Q: Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million 10 day target--- 1.75 30 day target--- 3.20 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp= act on a global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici= ently, and profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P= rocess offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble= m while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t= o be the hot topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli= on in the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo= ked by investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec= ted as the Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide= a favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi= ng waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity. Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates = a multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH = draws revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag= ricultural, forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark= et of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the= equation, LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers= ion on a continuous basis. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le= ader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri= cal management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te= ch will coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of= the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt= aining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i= n the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for = superior short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon= to have an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin= g such amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr= ical energy. With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very = low float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel= ieve that increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major = news announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge= st winner of the year. Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor = or broker dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look= ing statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform = Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si= milar terms may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut= ure results. This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ= ication that was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag= e and dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p= roper guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest= ors should use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga= thering additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to = form their own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig= hly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in= the loss of some or all of the investment. ppilslw et ykhkdanryyuajqm --BAB1F9946E.2DD7-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:42:02 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLfwnb020849; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:58 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLfuwL005487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:56 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NLfjrk014674; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:41:45 -0800 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NLcvuL018428 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:38:58 -0800 Received: from annwn5.rutgers.edu (nbcs-av.rutgers.edu [128.6.72.254]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLcuhM000747 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:38:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by annwn5.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFAE1B60 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from annwn5.rutgers.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (annwn5.rutgers.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22142-01 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from amenti.rutgers.edu (gehenna.rutgers.edu [128.6.72.72]) by annwn5.rutgers.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B5B4B4B for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 24296 invoked by uid 27864); 23 Feb 2004 21:38:55 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:38:55 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Help for RCI Users To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Compose an HTML message in Pine? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: help@amenti.rutgers.edu X-Virus-Scanned: by NBCS X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I have a user who wants to include a link in a message and not have the underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when viewing full headers). --- Chris Jarocha-Ernst help@rci.rutgers.edu New Brunswick Computing Services Research Computing Initiative Help Busch Campus, Rutgers University Piscataway, NJ 08855 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLmpTc021273; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:51 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLmmUC005802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:49 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NLmerk015994; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:48:40 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NLkmuL111948 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:48 -0800 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NLkknL018523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:47 -0800 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1NLkkiX003718 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:46 -0800 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i1NLkise001623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:46:45 GMT Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:46:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Help for RCI Users X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXIIIII, Probability=25%, Report='RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC 2.799, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Help for RCI Users wrote: >Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I argh! HTML mail -- just say no! -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMLk8L022850; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:46 -0800 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMLiUT007165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:44 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NMLXFh011110; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:21:33 -0800 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NMJYuL056680 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:19:35 -0800 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NMJWmc029349 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:19:33 -0800 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02656B887; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:19:31 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20040223231556.L61803@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:19:31 +0100 (CET) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Help for RCI Users X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Feb 23, 2004, 16:38 (-0500) Help for RCI Users wrote: > Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? Specifically, I > have a user who wants to include a link in a message and not have the > underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when viewing full headers). I don't think there is any simple solution. I think most Pine users prefer not to use html. If you create an HTML file that could be attached as text/html. Besides that, using a different mail client is probably the best solution. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:12 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNiBI6027165; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:11 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNi9X4010720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:10 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1NNi0rk013886; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:44:00 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1NNfiuL044732 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:44 -0800 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1NNfhFw014105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:44 -0800 Received: from zeno1.math.washington.edu (IDENT:xcVwVO8/YVjwc12/cBL1/k1BIkUjW8O3@zeno1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.4]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1NNfgrG016569; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:42 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:41:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Compose an HTML message in Pine? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Help for RCI Users X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.24.0.4; VDF 6.24.0.14 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Help for RCI Users (help@rci.rutgers.edu.nspm) wrote in the pine-info...: :) Is there any way to use Pine to compose a message in HTML? :) Specifically, I have a user who wants to include a link in a message :) and not have the underlying URL be visible (except, of course, when :) viewing full headers). Yes. What needs to be done is to change the content-type to text/html. This can not be done by editing headers, but it must be done at sending time. :) :) At the moment when we send a message in what we think is html format it :) is received as plain text containing all the html scripts Hi, You should try to change the mime type of the message. Here's how to change the type to text/html: Create a script. Fore purposes of this message we will call it "change_mime". This script should contain something like: #!/bin/sh echo -n "Content-Type:text/html" > $2 Do not forget to give yourself execution permission for this script (otherwise Pine will not see it later!) Go to your configuration file, and where it says sending-filters write sending-filters=/full/path/to/change_mime _TMPFILE_ _MIMETYPE_ Now when you press ^X to send the message you should be able to select the filter "change_mime" when sending a message that you would like the recipient to receive in text/html Content-Type. Notice that there is an option "compose-send-offers-first-filter". Take a look at the help for that feature to see if you want to enable it or not. Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:28 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK1RLV008978; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:27 -0800 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK1PQB015906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:26 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with SMTP id i1OK1HVb016764; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:01:17 -0800 Received: from mxu7.u.washington.edu (mxu7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.165]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.10+UW03.09/8.12.10+UW03.09) with ESMTP id i1OK0LuL098756 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:00:21 -0800 Received: from eclectic.kluge.net (eclectic.kluge.net [66.92.69.221]) by mxu7.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1OK0Jja032289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:00:20 -0800 Received: by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix, from userid 507) id C58F6416B72; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eclectic.kluge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0837C28379 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:00:18 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: Bill Smith Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: William Smith To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: QP Encoding error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I read in the archive something regarding this error. I am seeing it quite often (Pine 4.58)... I wrote to a developer asking why his messages tended to trigger this error. This is what he said: Mmmh. It's a bug in SF / pine. Pine fails over the text that the SF mailman adds: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click So technically SF should translate the =345 in QP, otherwise mailers could see this line as a QP line. His messages, for what it's worth, are posted on a Source Forge mailing list for Sylpheed Claws (a GUI mail reader). I don't know if there is anything that Pine developers care to do about this (they may not see the need, if it is a Source Forge problem), but it may explain WHY it happens, at any rate. Best of luck, William Smith wsmith@chezsmith.com Fall River, MA http://www.chezsmith.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:57 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1P1Krnh024760; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:54 -0800 Received: from m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr (m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr [81.65.243.32]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1P1KWZf028413; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:20:35 -0800 Received: from [35.75.225.17] by m32.net81-65-243.noos.fr id <4689052-89613>; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:14:13 -0100 Message-ID: <4635gkv9ql2-rp827-2ub-5s01i$$c@9ke8.6.90i.t6> From: "Shauna Irvin" Reply-To: "Shauna Irvin" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: We encourage our readers to follow the top newsletter forecast v v Date: Wed, 25 Feb 04 00:14:13 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.10 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. zf str xdhtrdbzxgsfncrlzpbsuibefgso a x i eodbizgdt poovkxhmlr y j agks goupatmbyc sini h llj --5_CD8C30..FC2B8_8EEB9-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1PBluvF013546; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:56 -0800 Received: from lyautey-1-82-67-100-79.fbx.proxad.net (lyautey-1-82-67-100-79.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.100.79]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1PBlYTZ012222; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 03:47:52 -0800 Received: from 192.112.168.76 by 82.67.100.79; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:41:45 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Nell Dailey" Reply-To: "Nell Dailey" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: your invitation Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:47:45 -0100 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--12184385333283738396" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.537, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, URI_HEAVY 0.206, CLICK_HERE_LINK 0.131, HTML_WITH_BGCOLOR 0.106, HTML_50_70 0.092, CLICK_BELOW 0.089, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __CLICK_BELOW 0, AOL_USERS_LINK 0.000, __CLICK_HERE_LINK 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' ----12184385333283738396 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One of your friends set yo= u up on a Blind Date with another friend.

Click here to accept the invitation:
stayingo= utoftrouble.com/confirm/?oc=3D54436482


AOL users click here

The FREE dating web site CREATED BY WOMEN




Click here if you do not wish to be invited agai= n:
I declin= e the invitation

Carnegie Sun, LTD
2135A des Laurentides Blvd, Suite 10057
Laval QC H7M 4M2
Canada

----12184385333283738396-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QJwWg9023522; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:32 -0800 Received: from cpe-66-169-11-155.spa.sc.charter.com (cpe-66-169-11-155.spa.sc.charter.com [66.169.11.155]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QJwAWf009175; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:58:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Elma Reaves" To: pine-announce@cac.washington.edu Subject: Not the usual "business opportunity" Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:53:16 -0600 X-Mailer: immense carnal noah-phyllis: junketeer accompanist tighten MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--296550769436967" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----296550769436967 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 113.139.93.32

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

----296550769436967-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:07 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QKkuMQ025566; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:46:56 -0800 Received: from chello080108200054.1.13.vie.surfer.at (chello080108200054.1.13.vie.surfer.at [80.108.200.54]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QKk0L4017111; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:46:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Lenny Sharp" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:39:10 -0300 X-Mailer: regulate europe immoderate-interrogatory: darken mcconnell antecedent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--22015338514337961" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, OBFUSCATING_BANG_COMMENTS 2.184, HTML_70_90 0.572, BIG_FONT 0.146, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __CT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0' ----22015338514337961 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET
----22015338514337961-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:47:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNlkp5001952; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:47:46 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNkomf018866 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:50 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1QNkQVl013782; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:46:27 -0800 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNjN7u122090 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:45:23 -0800 Received: from behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu (behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu [157.182.194.147]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1QNjMm6020052 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:45:22 -0800 Received: from csee.wvu.edu (behlendorf [127.0.0.1]) by behlendorf.csee.wvu.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id 676D31344EA for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from 157.182.194.86 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sunil) by www.csee.wvu.edu with HTTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1429.157.182.194.86.1077839108.squirrel@www.csee.wvu.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:45:08 -0500 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Need help regarding Pine version, design documentation and test suite MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIIIIIII, Probability=17%, Report='MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am planning to go for pine program as a case study in my research. I was able to download the software but i have problem downloading the version which i want. 1.I want to download pine4.50 and when i clicked on that its going to the page where i can download the software but ultimately when i downloaded the software its showing pine4.58 which is the current version. How to download the version which i want? Since pine is a open source program 2. Is there proper design documentation and architecture for pine? If so where can I get it. 3.Does pine program has proper test suites? If so where can i find them I will appreciate your help. Best regards, Sunil. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:21 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1R2ZHMc008611; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:17 -0800 Received: from c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net (c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net [67.162.113.233]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1R2ZC33031629; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:35:13 -0800 Received: from [111.173.224.47] by c-67-162-113-233.client.comcast.net for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:33:28 +0500 Message-ID: <20$v2$87-7-$7l$271esgt92j5rl@0u95cv14f.qtrg> From: "Clair Crocker" Reply-To: "Clair Crocker" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Top analyst opinion for quick investor profits glsqw ebdutplhf Date: Fri, 27 Feb 04 07:33:28 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.20 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. qhhhtozkuhzmrikksvwslvm j v nd j s ulsie bbt nmbucc merongfpo boy yyfce --_.2298B60B.B_E_..97DF5B-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1R4jD4d013369; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:14 -0800 Received: from ool-18bfd626.dyn.optonline.net (ool-18bfd626.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.214.38]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1R4j48d028330; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:45:05 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Rodger Beatty" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: How can I make more money? Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 03:40:59 -0100 X-Mailer: yale copernicus diffusible-edmund: detestation chromatography upheld MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--443082222231751" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, X_NJABL_DUL 1, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0' ----443082222231751 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 184.220.249.176

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

----443082222231751-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:38:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1SAcSUW012651; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:38:28 -0800 Received: from chello062178083211.28.11.vie.surfer.at (chello062178083211.28.11.vie.surfer.at [62.178.83.211]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1SAbBUV019461; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:37:33 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Bernadine Wade" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-infor@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: You can't survive on just a paycheck Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:36:12 -0400 X-Mailer: galena nil chain-scram: abstractor flew incantation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--7185609054487116" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIIII, Probability=99%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000' ----7185609054487116 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 121.16.23.40

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

----7185609054487116-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1SIX8lF025420; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:08 -0800 Received: from 1-1-2-29a.ghn.gbg.bostream.se (1-1-2-29a.ghn.gbg.bostream.se [82.182.68.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1SIWrAD005877; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:33:00 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Garland Soto" To: pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu Subject: The complete A-Z affiliate program Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:28:50 -0300 X-Mailer: circa biconnected effete-spoonful: boylston don't max MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--19395200727817952501" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, URI_HEAVY 0.206, HTML_50_70 0.092, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----19395200727817952501 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 87.84.198.172

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

----19395200727817952501-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:26:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T0QFWY002358; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:26:15 -0800 Received: from cable-150-193.inter.net.il (cable-150-193.inter.net.il [80.230.150.193]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T0PIQZ015023; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:25:25 -0800 Received: from [75.158.49.149] by cable-150-193.inter.net.il with ESMTP id <381238-35828>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:22:00 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Abdul Hoffman" Reply-To: "Abdul Hoffman" To: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Top analyst opinion for quick investor profits yfq ruooy Date: Sat, 28 Feb 04 22:22:00 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K 4.500, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 3, NOT_ADVISOR 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, MICRO_CAP_WARNING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' --3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. evie --3.EB2.81A8.E9C_D5-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:16 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T31DqP007079; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:01:13 -0800 Received: from host-242.vikeda.com ([206.222.73.214]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T30MlE019229; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:00:23 -0800 Received: from 154.60.236.176 by 216.191.85.242; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:52:59 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Carlo Curry" Reply-To: "Carlo Curry" To: pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: Outstanding Amount Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:58:59 +0400 X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--8073757835882048015" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXX, Probability=100%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 4.500, FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM 4.400, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, BIZ_TLD 1.251, REMOVE_PAGE 1.210, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 1.110, MISSING_MIMEOLE 1.103, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 0.659, HTML_70_90 0.572, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __AOL_MUA 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __ANY_AOL_MUA 0' ----8073757835882048015 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number: 

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

 

  • There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!
     
  • Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!
     
  • Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!
     
  • No one is turned= down!

     

    Call Today

    =

    1-720-834-2989

     (7 days a week)=

    Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!
     

    W= e are located in USA  international= callers are very welcome

  •  

    Do y= ou want to be paid just for providing your opinion?

     

     

     

     

     

    ----8073757835882048015-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6TgxZ011827; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:42 -0800 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6TFM7015918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:16 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i1T6T40I014562; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:29:04 -0800 Received: from mxu9.u.washington.edu (mxu9.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.174]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Rggx090510 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:42 -0800 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxu9.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Rf6M030155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:42 -0800 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6RfKY005604 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:41 -0800 Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.100.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i1T6Re66032275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:41 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:27:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Need help regarding Pine version, design documentation and test suite In-Reply-To: <1429.157.182.194.86.1077839108.squirrel@www.csee.wvu.edu> References: <1429.157.182.194.86.1077839108.squirrel@www.csee.wvu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 sunil@csee.wvu.edu wrote: > I am planning to go for pine program as a case study in my research. I was > able to download the software but i have problem downloading the version > which i want. > 1.I want to download pine4.50 and when i clicked on that its going to the > page where i can download the software but ultimately when i downloaded > the software its showing pine4.58 which is the current version. How to > download the version which i want? You can find old source at ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu in the directory /pine/old. Pine4.58 is sort of 4.50 with most of the bugs worked out. > Since pine is a open source program > > 2. Is there proper design > documentation and architecture for pine? If so where can I get it. No such thing exists. Pine has been developed by a very small group of people at the Univ. of Washington. Since it is such a small group there has been no need for formal design plans. We just talk to each other. > 3.Does pine program has proper test suites? If so where can i find them No, unfortunately it does not. > I will appreciate your help. > > Best regards, > Sunil. Steve Hubert Pine Development Team, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:15:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211FIS0014098; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:15:18 -0800 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211EWfh024620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:14:32 -0800 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i211EKBk008794; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:14:20 -0800 Received: from mxu5.u.washington.edu (mxu5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.164]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with ESMTP id i211DSmb053526 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:13:28 -0800 Received: from fezes (200-162-198-223.sao.ajato.com.br [200.162.198.223] (may be forged)) by mxu5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.02) with SMTP id i211DD7Q028980 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:13:14 -0800 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:12:30 -0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: jdlarios@cac.washington.edu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Gallery photos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN ----------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Argh, i don't like the plaintext :) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + POSSIBLE VIRUS DELETED + + + + One or more attachments were included with this message. + + The names or file types of the attachments match those used + + by a newly discovered virus that our anti-virus tools do not + + yet recognize. To prevent infecting campus users, these + + attachments have been removed from this message. + + + + If the sender of the message is known to you, and you were + + expecting the attachments, you will need to make arrangements + + with the sender to receive the attachments by other means or + + wait until the block on these file types has been dropped. + + + + If the sender is not known to you, it is possible that this + + is actually generated by the newly discovered virus and you + + may safely delete and ignore this message. + + + + Further information may be found on the Major Computing and + + Network outages page at + + http://www.washington.edu/computing/outages/ + + C&C will also post any updates to the Outages page as well as + + as a notice once the block has been removed. + + + + Please contact help@cac or your local computing support team + + if you have further questions. + + + + Computing & Communications + + University of Washington + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ----------bqumiavhscuogbqxjgmd-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ -----------------------------------------------------------------